↓ Skip to main content

Spandidos Publications

Article Metrics

Beneficial effects of hydrogen gas inhalation on a murine model of allergic rhinitis

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Beneficial effects of hydrogen gas inhalation on a murine model of allergic rhinitis
Published in
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, October 2018
DOI 10.3892/etm.2018.6880
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shengjian Fang, Xinqian Li, Xian Wei, Yu Zhang, Zhaoxin Ma, Youzhen Wei, Weihua Wang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2020.
All research outputs
#12,294,838
of 15,474,261 outputs
Outputs from Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
#718
of 1,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,762
of 263,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,474,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,889 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.